Over the years I have learned to be more patient. In the not too distant past and in the interest of quick results, I frequently told people how to solve problems – which countermeasures to apply as well as where and when. I do that a lot less now, but admittedly I still sometimes lapse.
Telling is fine when time is short and the real risk to life, limb and financial viability are high. But, if we were to honestly reflect on the frequency of these types of situations, we would see that they’re pretty rare. Unfortunately, it’s normal to make a false choice between urgent and important.
So, what’s important? Certainly, building a lean culture, part of which is an organization of effective problem solvers, is eminently important. Effective problem solvers know how to apply PDCA and take responsibility for solving their assigned or adopted problems.
How powerful is an organization of engaged and empowered problem solvers? A lot more powerful than a handful of puppet masters pulling the strings of a bunch of disenfranchised folks.
Think about it. If someone tells you “how” to solve the problem, then you do not, and cannot, really own it. You essentially end up being an un-invested robot. You also end up with very limited (felt) responsibility, because the leader took the P, C, and A away from you and left you with just the D of PDCA. When you execute what someone has told you to do (and you have little insight into the “why” ) and it doesn’t work…well, it’s that do-telling bozo’s fault. Just following orders! I’ll wait for the next set of orders. Not good.
So, what to do? Try coaching your people on the why and the underlying methodology behind PDCA. Surely, make certain that they never violate lean principles – for example, observe reality, takt, flow, pull, etc. Coach them by asking them penetrating questions that will force them to think and hopefully adjust when required. Hold them accountable, but allow them to fail…and learn. In short, respect them and gain a fellow lean thinker, lean doer and lean owner.
Related posts: Lean Leadership – Lessons from My Dog Obedience Sensei, Stretch, Don’t Break – 5 ways to grow your people



Ask a question here 

#1 by John Bushling on October 10th, 2010
Quote
I’ve been guilty of the same. There are those times when time seems of the essence and the team just isn’t getting ‘there’. However, just as was mentioned, ownership goes to zero as does responsibility.
Giving the ‘How” will never keep them there. More coaching will get them there and that will over ride the time and build the culture.
John Bushling
#2 by markrhamel on October 10th, 2010
Quote
Hi John,
Thanks for comment! We could probably start up our own recovering “How Tellers” group. I’m sure there are more of us out there.
You are exactly right, giving them the “how” won’t keep people, won’t change them. It’s got to be coaching and with that learn, see, do.
Best regards,
Mark
#3 by Brian Buck on October 11th, 2010
Quote
I agree that teaching HOW is not a way to dvelop people. As a consultant, I usually never tell HOW which sometimes causes people to get frustrated because they just want the answer and move on.
I am working at being more transparent on why I am coaching them to be problem solvers instead of just implementing my solutions!
#4 by Chris Paulsen on October 11th, 2010
Quote
Mark,
You describe the perils of micro-management quite well. I believe that micro-managing is even worse when it’s in a participative environment where one can and should be tapping into the potential of their people. Thanks for sharing.
Chris
Chris Paulsen recently posted..One Man With Courage
#5 by markrhamel on October 11th, 2010
Quote
Hi Brian,
Thanks for commenting. Excellent point on being transparent with the folks that you are mentoring. Some people think they have to do the mystical sensei thing and aren’t so transparent. Not necessarily a great approach.
Hope the new baby is doing well.
Best regards,
Mark
#6 by markrhamel on October 11th, 2010
Quote
Hi Chris,
Thanks for weighing in! Yes, I don’t know ANYONE who likes being micro-managed. Real muda.
Thanks,
Mark
#7 by Mark Graban on October 17th, 2010
Quote
Seems like there is a lot of “do telling” going on with “lean” at Starbucks (http://www.leanblog.org/2010/10/lean-at-starbucks-or-tayloristic-industrial-engineering/)
They need to read your blog post!
#8 by markrhamel on October 17th, 2010
Quote
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the comment!
Yes, when I first read the WSJ article, I thought it was pretty whacky. I’m not a coffee drinker and not a Starbucks customer, but I know that their demand is pretty “lumpy.” I’m not sure how such a rigid standard WIP requirement works within such an environment. And the quotes from some of the workers reflected a deeper understanding of lean principles than perhaps the “lean teams” have. Not sensing a lot of associate driven improvement here, which is pretty much always a BAD thing from both a technical and cultural perspective…not to mention the ostensible lack of customer focus!
Best regards,
Mark
#9 by Andrew Bishop on October 27th, 2010
Quote
Mark:
Here’s a quote I know is accurate, because it’s my own: “The imperfect improvement that belongs to the people who do the work is the best possible outcome”.
Tell them and then go away, and the possible outcomes include:
“That was a dumb idea, but he said to, so we’ll keep doing it”
“That was a dumb idea, let’s drop it” or,
“OK, whatever, we’ll do what we’re told”.
If, on the other hand the problem (and the imperfect solution) belong to the people who do the work day-in and day-out, you are more likely to hear: “This could be better, let’s try something else.”
#10 by markrhamel on October 27th, 2010
Quote
Andrew,
Awesome! The only thing that I can add is, “Amen.”
Thanks for sharing your quote.
Best regards,
Mark